[December 9, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 236)] [Unified Agenda] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [frwais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:ua09de02_011-66] [Page 74686-74687] Department of Justice (DOJ) Final Rule Stage Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) _______________________________________________________________________ 1588. INDUSTRIAL USE OF PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS DERIVED FROM CANNABIS PLANTS Priority: Other Significant Legal Authority: 21 USC 802; 21 USC 811; 21 USC 812; 21 USC 871(b) CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1308 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: DEA published three rules simultaneously in the Federal Register regarding the status of products manufactured from the cannabis plant. The three rules were as follows. The first rule was an interpretive rule, which provided DEA's interpretation of existing law with respect to the listing [[Page 74687]] of tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and DEA regulations. (Please see ``Additional Information'' for further details.) The second rule was a proposed rule to revise the wording of the DEA regulations to more clearly reflect DEA's interpretation of the law as set forth in the interpretive rule. The proposed rule made clear that the listing of THC in Schedule I included both natural and synthetic THC and that any substance containing any amount of THC is a Schedule I controlled substance--even if such substance was made from ``hemp.'' The third rule was an interim rule, which exempted from application of the CSA and DEA regulations certain industrial ``hemp'' products. DEA issued this rule to allow the continuation of what have historically been considered legitimate industrial uses of ``hemp.'' Under this rule, industrial ``hemp'' products such as paper, rope, and clothing may continue to be marketed in the United States without being subject to the CSA. At the same time, in order to protect the public health and safety, the interim rule did not allow ``hemp'' products that result in THC entering the human body. In this manner, it remained clear that the only lawful way THC may enter the human body is when a person is using a federally approved drug or when the person is the subject of federally approved research. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Clarification of Listing of Tetrahydrocannabinols NPRM 10/09/01 (66 FR 51535) NPRM Comment Period End 12/10/01 Final Action 03/00/03 Exemption From Control of Certain Industrial Products and Material Derived From the Cannabis Plant Interim Final Rule 10/09/01 (66 FR 51539) Interim Final Rule Comment Period End 12/10/01 Interim Final Rule Extending Grace Period 02/15/02 (67 FR 7073) Final Action 03/00/ 03 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: None Additional Information: While agencies are not required to include information regarding interpretive rules in the Unified Agenda, DEA is providing a description of this interpretive rule for informational purposes. The interpretive rule provided DEA's interpretation of existing law with respect to the listing of tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and DEA regulations. The rule further provided DEA's interpretation of the current legal status of products containing THC. In recent months, DEA received numerous inquiries from members of the public about the legal status of products made from ``hemp'' (portions of the cannabis plant excluded from the CSA definition of marijuana). As stated in this rule, DEA interprets the CSA such that any substance containing any amount of THC is a Schedule I controlled substance--even if such substance is made from ``hemp.'' Agency Contact: Frank Sapienza, Chief, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Washington, DC 20537 Phone: 202 307-7183 RIN: 1117-AA55 _______________________________________________________________________